How the scam operates.
Operasi ini menampilkan dirinya sebagai layanan dompet Ethereum yang sah dan setara dengan standar perbankan. Dengan memadukan nama yang erat dikaitkan dengan penyedia dompet ternama dan top-level domain .bank, yang umumnya dibatasi hanya untuk lembaga keuangan yang diatur, situs ini memproyeksikan sinyal ganda berupa keakraban dan kredibilitas institusional. Target yang dituju kemungkinan besar adalah pengguna Ethereum mana pun yang mencari akses ke dompet, terutama mereka yang mungkin tidak mencermati URL secara saksama atau yang berasumsi bahwa akhiran .bank menandakan adanya pengawasan regulasi formal.
Operasi yang dibangun atas model ini umumnya berfungsi sebagai infrastruktur Phishing untuk memanen kredensial. Pengunjung menjumpai antarmuka yang dirancang untuk meniru secara mendetail sebuah layanan dompet tepercaya, yang mendorong mereka untuk memasukkan seed phrase, private key, atau persetujuan koneksi dompet. Setiap kredensial yang dimasukkan ditangkap oleh operator. Pada sebagian varian, situs ini langsung memulai transfer token tanpa izin segera setelah koneksi dilakukan; pada varian lain, kredensial yang dipanen disimpan dan digunakan kemudian, sehingga operator dapat menguras dompet pada waktu yang mereka pilih sendiri sekaligus mempersulit pelacakan asal-usul tindakan tersebut.
Titik penyadaran biasanya tiba setelah pengguna memasukkan seed phrase atau private key, atau setelah mereka menyadari adanya transaksi keluar tanpa izin dari dompet yang terhubung. Pada tahap itu, operator telah memegang segala hal yang diperlukan untuk mengakses akun tersebut. Transaksi blockchain bersifat tidak dapat dibatalkan, dan operator yang menjalankan infrastruktur peniruan semacam ini cenderung mengonsolidasikan dan memindahkan dana dengan cepat. Jendela waktu untuk intervensi yang bermakna sangatlah sempit, dan pemulihan aset yang telah ditransfer melalui sarana teknis semata jarang dapat dilakukan.
Red flags we documented.
- 01Brand impersonation via domain nameThe domain reproduces the name of a widely recognised Ethereum wallet service almost exactly, combined with a different top-level domain. This is a textbook typosquatting and brand-impersonation technique, intended to intercept users who trust the original brand and may not examine the full URL before proceeding.
- 02Misuse of the .bank TLD as a trust signalThe .bank top-level domain is subject to strict eligibility requirements and is conventionally associated with regulated banking institutions. Its use here appears designed to imply formal financial oversight that this operation does not hold, exploiting user assumptions about domain-name gatekeeping to lower vigilance.
- 03Presence on an independent fraud intelligence databaseThe domain is listed on the CryptoScamDB blacklist, an independently maintained registry of confirmed malicious cryptocurrency-related domains and addresses. Inclusion indicates the site has been identified through community reporting or automated detection as actively harmful to users.
- 04No verifiable operator identity or regulatory footingPhishing operations built around brand impersonation characteristically provide no verifiable information about the entity behind the service: no company registration, no licence numbers, no physical address. This absence is structurally consistent with an operation designed to be abandoned and replaced once detected by fraud databases or wallet providers.
- 05Private-key entry through a web interface is a critical warning patternAny platform prompting users to enter seed phrases or private keys into a browser-based form should be treated as high-risk by default. Reputable, non-custodial wallet providers do not require users to submit these credentials through web interfaces, making any such prompt a strong indicator of credential-harvesting intent.
What you can do now.
Open a free 24-hour case assessment with CryptoLeek +
Tell us what happened. A senior analyst reads your file within 24 hours and replies with an honest yes/no/conditional on recovery. The assessment is free. If we cannot recover the funds we say so plainly, including which (free) regulator channel you should use instead. If we accept the case, we open a numbered case file and issue a written quote for a flat investigation retainer before any work begins, scoped to case complexity, the jurisdictions involved, and the on-chain trail.
Trace your funds on-chain with our analysts +
We trace stolen crypto across BTC, ETH, EVM L2s, Solana, Tron, and major stablecoins using the same toolchain as regulators and tier-1 exchange compliance teams. The output is a forensic report anchored to specific transaction hashes and block heights, the evidence that exchanges, payment processors, and counsel actually act on. Recovery starts here.
Recover with counsel where civil action makes sense +
Where the trace lands in a jurisdiction with cooperative banks and courts, we coordinate with bar-licensed counsel in our 40+ jurisdiction network for civil action and asset-freezing orders (Mareva-style). Counsel bill you directly; the CryptoLeek investigation retainer is independent of counsel fees. The outcome is funds released back to your nominated wallet or bank account.