How the scam operates.
Bitvest Globalは、デンマーク法の下で運営される暗号資産投資プラットフォームを自称し、規制遵守と法人としての正当性を備えているかのような印象を演出しています。同社のウェブサイトは、預け入れを検討する潜在的な顧客を安心させるよう設計されており、表面的な提示には設立関連書類への言及や規制当局による監督を示唆する内容が含まれ、暗号資産へのエクスポージャーを求める個人投資家を標的とした、体系的かつ専門的に運営される事業体として位置づけられています。
この信頼性の枠組みは、最初の検証時点で崩壊します。プラットフォームのどこにも規制当局の証明書は表示されていません。同運営者がデンマーク法に基づく統治を主張しているにもかかわらず、デンマーク金融監督庁の登録簿を検索しても該当する記載は見つかりません。本来であれば設立証明書（Certificate of Incorporation）や会社概要（About Us）のセクションを含む裏付け資料へのアクセスを提供するはずのナビゲーションリンクは、機能していません。運営者が自らの法的地位について主張する内容と、独立した検証によって確認できる内容との間の隔たりは、決定的なものです。
破綻が訪れるのは、出金が要求された時点です。このように構築された事業の被害者は、通常、捏造された遵守要件、段階的に膨らむ手数料の請求、あるいは意志をくじくために仕組まれた継続的な遅延に直面します。FCAは2025年9月、Bitvest Globalに対して公的な警告を発し、無認可の金融サービスの提供者の疑いがあると指定しました。この種の規制当局による警告は、一般に被害が発生した後に発出されます。預け入れを行った顧客にとって、警告は通常、資金がすでに投じられた後に届くのです。
Red flags we documented.
- 01FCA Warning Issued: Suspected Unauthorised OperationThe Financial Conduct Authority issued a public warning against Bitvest Global in September 2025, designating it a suspected provider of unauthorised financial services or products. An FCA warning of this category reflects an active assessment of investor risk. It signals that the operation has no authorised standing with the UK's primary financial regulator.
- 02Claimed Danish Jurisdiction Finds No FSA RegistrationBitvest Global asserts governance under Danish law, implying oversight by the Danish Financial Supervisory Authority. No matching registration appears in that register. Claiming a recognised regulatory jurisdiction without the corresponding registration is a common tactic used to borrow legitimacy from a regime the operator has never entered.
- 03Compliance Documentation Links Are Non-functionalThe platform's links to its Certificate of Incorporation and About Us section cannot be opened. These documents are the primary means by which a prospective depositor can verify the legal identity of the entity they are entrusting with funds. Their absence removes all independent verification of the operator's legal standing.
- 04No Statutory Protection for Deposited FundsOperating without a recognised licence means deposited funds fall outside any statutory investor compensation scheme. Clients of properly authorised firms have defined legal recourse when those firms fail or act improperly. Clients of unlicensed operations hold no equivalent standing, which is precisely why the licensing requirement exists.
What you can do now.
Open a free 24-hour case assessment with CryptoLeek +
Tell us what happened. A senior analyst reads your file within 24 hours and replies with an honest yes/no/conditional on recovery. The assessment is free. If we cannot recover the funds we say so plainly, including which (free) regulator channel you should use instead. If we accept the case, we open a numbered case file and issue a written quote for a flat investigation retainer before any work begins, scoped to case complexity, the jurisdictions involved, and the on-chain trail.
Trace your funds on-chain with our analysts +
We trace stolen crypto across BTC, ETH, EVM L2s, Solana, Tron, and major stablecoins using the same toolchain as regulators and tier-1 exchange compliance teams. The output is a forensic report anchored to specific transaction hashes and block heights, the evidence that exchanges, payment processors, and counsel actually act on. Recovery starts here.
Recover with counsel where civil action makes sense +
Where the trace lands in a jurisdiction with cooperative banks and courts, we coordinate with bar-licensed counsel in our 40+ jurisdiction network for civil action and asset-freezing orders (Mareva-style). Counsel bill you directly; the CryptoLeek investigation retainer is independent of counsel fees. The outcome is funds released back to your nominated wallet or bank account.