How the scam operates.
BivaltoFxは、ASIC、ESMA、CySECという3つの主要な金融当局からの監督を主張し、自らを規制対象のオンラインブローカーとして提示していました。このプラットフォームの視覚デザインと記載内容は、少なくとも1社の正規に認可を受けた企業のものを忠実に模倣するように構築されており、表面上は機関としての信頼性を備えているように見せかけていました。サイトに表示されていた登録番号は、その後、運営者と一致しないSVG FSAの記録に属するものであることが判明し、正規の登録ではなく認証情報の不正流用が行われていたことを示しています。
この手口は、作り上げられた正当性に依存しています。規制対象企業のブランディングを複製することで、運営者は、見込み客が通常であれば規制に関する主張を独自に検証しようとする際に抱く懐疑心を弱めます。被害者は、第一級の規制当局に裏付けられた信頼できる取引プラットフォームと見える対象に遭遇し、そのまま資金を入金してしまいます。ASICおよびESMAのデータベースと照合した結果、BivaltoFxに該当する登録は一切確認されず、CySECは2025年2月に、運営者が必要な認可を得ずに事業を行っていたことを正式に確認しました。
破綻が生じる時点は、通常、出金請求の時期と一致します。その段階で、この運営を支えるインフラは、資金の引き出しを妨げる条件を課すか、あるいは単に応答を停止します。BivaltoFxの場合、主要なドメインが完全にオフラインとなり、被害を受けた利用者にとってアクセス可能な連絡手段が一切失われました。さらに、bivaltofx.coという第2のドメインも特定されており、これは旧来の被害者が資金を回収できない状態に置かれたまま、入金の勧誘を継続するための予備インフラを維持する運営者の手口と一致しています。
Red flags we documented.
- 01No Regulatory Authorisation Despite Multiple ClaimsCySEC issued a formal warning in February 2025 confirming BivaltoFx operated without the required authorisation. Independent checks against ASIC and ESMA registries returned no record of the platform. Legitimate brokers do not require prospective clients to discover their regulatory standing through third-party investigations.
- 02Stolen or Fabricated Regulatory CredentialsThe registration number displayed on the BivaltoFx website corresponds to SVG FSA records inconsistent with the operator's identity. Presenting another entity's regulatory identifier is a pattern associated with clone-firm operations designed to deceive investors at the point of initial deposit, before any verification is attempted.
- 03Website Content Copied from a Licensed BrokerInvestigators found the BivaltoFx website closely replicated the visual design and written content of at least one authorised brokerage. Duplicated content lowers the cost of appearing credible and is a recognised technique used by fraudulent operations to pass superficial due diligence by retail investors.
- 04Primary Domain Taken OfflineThe domain bivaltofx.com became inaccessible as of mid-2025. Operators typically take platforms offline when regulatory scrutiny intensifies or the available pool of new depositors has been exhausted, leaving affected users without a functional point of contact or any avenue for recourse.
- 05Secondary Domain Signals Continued ActivityA second domain, bivaltofx.co, was identified alongside the primary. Operating parallel domains is consistent with operators who anticipate domain loss and maintain fallback infrastructure to continue acquiring deposits from new targets while earlier victims remain unresolved.
What you can do now.
Open a free 24-hour case assessment with CryptoLeek +
Tell us what happened. A senior analyst reads your file within 24 hours and replies with an honest yes/no/conditional on recovery. The assessment is free. If we cannot recover the funds we say so plainly, including which (free) regulator channel you should use instead. If we accept the case, we open a numbered case file and issue a written quote for a flat investigation retainer before any work begins, scoped to case complexity, the jurisdictions involved, and the on-chain trail.
Trace your funds on-chain with our analysts +
We trace stolen crypto across BTC, ETH, EVM L2s, Solana, Tron, and major stablecoins using the same toolchain as regulators and tier-1 exchange compliance teams. The output is a forensic report anchored to specific transaction hashes and block heights, the evidence that exchanges, payment processors, and counsel actually act on. Recovery starts here.
Recover with counsel where civil action makes sense +
Where the trace lands in a jurisdiction with cooperative banks and courts, we coordinate with bar-licensed counsel in our 40+ jurisdiction network for civil action and asset-freezing orders (Mareva-style). Counsel bill you directly; the CryptoLeek investigation retainer is independent of counsel fees. The outcome is funds released back to your nominated wallet or bank account.